AREN2231 A Study Using Risk Factors to Determine Treatment for Children With Favorable Histology Wilms Tumors (FHWT)
Categories (click each to see list of all clinical trials associated with that category): Pediatric (PEDONC)
Current Status: Open
Phase: III (Cancer Control)
Principal Investigator: Beck, Jill
Contact Information:
Angie Boettner
aboettner@unmc.edu
Eligibility: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06401330?term=NCT06401330&rank=1&tab=table#recruitment-information
Summary
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To maintain event-free survival (EFS) for Stage I favorable histology Wilms tumor (FHWT) patients without adverse biology who are also (1) 2 to < 4 years of age, OR (2) age < 2 years with tumor weight of 550 grams or more, OR (3) age 4+ years with epithelial histology subtype while reducing post-nephrectomy therapy from vincristine, actinomycin (EE-4A) to Nephrectomy Only. (Stage I Nephrectomy Only Stratum 2) II. To improve EFS for Stage I FHWT patients with age < 2 years AND nephrectomy weight < 550g AND whose tumors have adverse biology by treating with EE-4A instead of Nephrectomy Only. (Stage I EE-4A Stratum 3) III. To evaluate whether addition of vincristine and irinotecan to standard EE-4A (novel vincristine, actinomycin, irinotecan [Regimen VIVA]) is non-inferior to vincristine, actinomycin, doxorubicin (DD-4A) in terms of EFS among Stage II FHWT patients whose tumors demonstrate adverse biology. (Stage II: VIVA versus [vs] DD-4A Randomization) IV. To evaluate whether omission of doxorubicin (EE-4A) is non-inferior to historical DD-4A in Stage III FHWT patients with standard biology or post-therapy blastemal predominance. (Stage III: EE-4A) V. To demonstrate the non-inferiority of vincristine, actinomycin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide and irinotecan (Regimen MVI) to vincristine, dactinomycin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and etoposide (Regimen M) in the treatment of Stage III FHWT patients whose tumors exhibit adverse biology (post-chemotherapy blastemal predominance excluded). (Stage III: Regimen MVI vs Regimen M Randomization) VI. To demonstrate the non-inferiority of Regimen MVI to Regimen M in the treatment of Stage IV FHWT patients with adverse biology, slow incomplete lung response (SIR), or extrapulmonary metastases (EPM) (post-therapy blastemal predominance excluded). (Stage IV: Regimen MVI vs Regimen M Randomization) VII. To demonstrate the superiority of vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, carboplatin and irinotecan (Regimen UH-3) vs historical DD-4A or Regimen M in treatment of Stage III or IV FHWT patients with blastemal predominance at delayed nephrectomy. (Stage III-IV: UH-3 (Blastemal Predominance)